Friday, February 15, 2008

David Horowitz is not my Savior

While it may not seem directly relevant to his relentless assault on academia, David Horowitz’ latest attempt at hysterical fear-mongering should make anyone committed to the free exchange of ideas shiver in their boots. Purportedly launched across a hundred college campuses on—no kidding—Valentine’s Day, it’s no accident that his campaign to “stop the genocide that Islamic radicals are planning” aims at college students—and, of course, at their professors (

Don’t get me wrong; I and countless others take senseless loss of life, wherever it occurs, very seriously. In fact, many of us take it so seriously that we seek to educate ourselves about the histories, the contexts, the religions, the cultures, the politics, and the economics of each distinctive nation because we know—as Horowitz utterly ignores—that facts matter. No matter how many times he denies that he’s referring to all Muslims, when Horowitz refers to Islamofascism he knows he’s smothering the relevance of historical fact in the perverse service of creating a monster with which he can fear-monger his way to realizing his real aims.

And these are not far to find. The Declaration Against Genocide is, first and foremost, a thinly veiled attempt to salvage what little momentum there was for “Islamofascism Awareness Week.” Despite Horowitz’ proclamations on Fox that it was the largest student uprising against Islamic radicals, the week was in fact orchestrated, executed, and spun by Horowitz. Not one wit of it involved any spontaneous student “uprising,” and not one event’s focus was students. Many students, I think, even got it that they were just pawns in his latest photo-op. That Horowitz was booed was a given; that some protesters played into his hands unfortunate.

But for the love of Pete, wouldn’t it be great if students could be rallied to care about real issues? Part of what’s so disturbing and warped about the Horowitz’ campaign is that there are real issues, real genocides, real wars about which students should care (and many—but not enough—do). The Middle East is a tinder-box—but as any real academic knows, simple answers aren’t captured by a hate campaign, and the United States is certainly no innocent player.

Nonetheless, the same Horowitz who insists that these poor “kids” are unwitting dolts manipulated by evil Leftist college professors is the Horowitz who’d cast them in the role of patriots ready to resist the Islamofascists. What stunning hypocrisy. What Horowitz does not want students to get, of course, is that their own government behaves in ways rightly characterized as fascist, that it has engaged in the greatest assault on civil liberty we’ve seen since McCarthy, that it sanctions torture, that it spies on citizens, and that it actively suppresses science not in favor of its corporate-military policies. He calls folks who have the guts to expose this corrupt administration “America haters,” branding those who are in fact the real patriots—the ones willing to stand up against fear-mongering—as traitors.

And this brings me to the second real aim of the Declaration Against Genocide, namely, that, given everything we know about his past strategies and actions, campaigns and interviews, its clear that the Declaration isn’t really about genocide at all; it’s about Horowitz’ latest attempt to attack academics. Consider: He drafts a declaration purporting a genocidal “plan.” He claims that this “plan” has been inexplicably ignored by academics—implying that we have failed to take terrorism seriously. He then postures himself as a savior—offering us a chance at redemption, and all we need do is sign the thing and we can avoid being, well, traitors. No doubt, the declaration is aimed particularly at feminists and other assorted “leftists,” the sinners most in need of the salvation only Horowitz can offer.

How utterly manipulative and opportunistic. The declaration is nothing other than the attempt to (a) turn students against professors on the wholly unwarranted supposition that we have failed to take terrorism seriously, (b) turn public sentiment against the academy on these same grounds, and (c) chill the free exchange of ideas; signing the declaration is signing onto an entire ideology about the good and the evil—and Horowitz knows it.

Lastly, the declaration is about Horowitz and his apparent savior complex. I don’t need to be an expert in neurosis to see that he’s awaiting his next interview on O’Reilly to propagandize for the fascism he favors. But as I have said along with many others many times: among the greatest dangers of our time is the religious extremism that undergirds the profoundly bigoted rhetoric of “us against them.”

David Horowitz is a poster child for bigotry, and it’s our responsibility not only to see through the spin to his motives, but to actively resist propaganda that can lead us nowhere but to world war. The academy must remain a safe haven for the free exchange of ideas and the unencumbered liberty to express them. The Declaration Against Genocide is, in fact, a hate-mongering loyalty oath, and David Horowitz its mercenary salesman.

Wendy Lynne Lee


Anonymous said...

Muslims Against Sharia is proud to be the first Muslim organization to sign Declaration Against Genocide!

Wendy Lynne Lee said...

Again, I applaud the stand you have taken against the oppression of women in Islam (and I hope this extends to the oppression of women in all of the major religious traditions and their shared histories), but I must inform you thay you are simply being used by an organization--David Horowitz, et. al.,--who has no interest whatever in women's human rights or welfare, but are more than happy to exploit you to their own right-wing anti-human rights ends. Horowitz is not the ally of democracy. Quite to the contrary, he'd be perfectly happy to see imposed the dictatorship of his own god's representatives--and I assure you this would in no way favor respect for you.

Anonymous said...

Wendy Lynne Lee,

Do you have a basis for your opinions about David Horowitz?


Wendy Lynne Lee said...

Dear MASH,

Absolutely--and indeed so do you have excellent reasons to distance yourselves as far as possible from Horowitz and company's mercenary exploitation of you. What a research of many of the columns posted on FrontPageMag will show you (especially H's Blog entries) is that he has nothing but contempt for scholarship which devotes itself to the exposure of the abuse of women. H. consistently attacks Women's Studies programs in the U.S. even though some of the very best critique of the status of women in Islam, Christianity, Judaism, and Hinduism can be found in it. Sharia (along with its counterparts in fundamentalist Christianity) has been the subject of considerable attention by feminists, American and otherwise, for years. I and others have pointed this scholarship out to him--including the names of these excellent scholars and the titles of their work--but he opts to ignore the evidence because to acknowledge it would be tantamount to acknowleding that his aim is to fabricate a monster--Feminist Leftist Indoctrination--in order to justify his assault on it.

Fact is, any scholarship that does not confirm H's complete condemnation of Islam regardless history, cultural differences in religious pratice, or the role of the United States in this history does not count as scholarship for him. He attacks Women's Studies only because he wishes to eliminate it in favor of imposing his own vision of what the academy should look like--very white, very Christian, very male. If you have ANY doubt about this, please consult Dennis Prager's collumn about how parents should select a college (this week, FrontPageMag).

The fact is that H. supports you only because he can use sharia as a bludgeon against Islam generally--If you think for a moment that his references to Islamofascism don't include you, you are sadly mistaken. As he makes patently clear in his rhetoric, the only good Muslim is one who effectively denounces Islam or, at least, makes no demonstration of his faith.

Consider the evidence: H. and co. regularly smear through fallacies like guilt by association, straw fallacy, red herring, and ad hominem anyone who has ever had any connection--regardless its manifest innocence--to Islam. The smearing just this past week of Barack Obama is a plainly obvious case in point.

And if you think that Horowitz has the least interest in the support of women as human beings deservant of equality, you are, once again, sadly mistaken. H. actively supports the likes of Ann Coulter who claims that among the worst things that have occurred in America was the extension of the right to vote for women--and she means it.

The Declaration Against Genocide is nothing but H's latest cynical and calculating attempt to paint academics as "America-haters." If you have any doubt about his aims here, I suggest you read the history of Joseph McCarthy. You will find this very instructive.